<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HR 45 (debunked)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/</link>
	<description>Discuss HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:11:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapps47</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-1685</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapps47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/#comment-1685</guid>
		<description>you know no one has to say you loose your right for it to happen.

Let me explain to you. The 2nd amendment is there to protect all the other rights against tyranny and corruption. Without this right we would of been invaded along time ago.

If someone limits the second amendment to the point that it becomes impossible or very hard to excersize the right of itself. That is the same as someone taking it away. right? Good I am glad you understand now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you know no one has to say you loose your right for it to happen.</p>
<p>Let me explain to you. The 2nd amendment is there to protect all the other rights against tyranny and corruption. Without this right we would of been invaded along time ago.</p>
<p>If someone limits the second amendment to the point that it becomes impossible or very hard to excersize the right of itself. That is the same as someone taking it away. right? Good I am glad you understand now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfizz313</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-1686</link>
		<dc:creator>jfizz313</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/#comment-1686</guid>
		<description>who saies you will loose your right?


no one o i thought so...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who saies you will loose your right?</p>
<p>no one o i thought so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapps47</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapps47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>Well if you sell them to someone who should not have them as is ALREADY stated in the law then you will go to jail.

therefore it makes no sense to make more laws concerning gun control for laws allready in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if you sell them to someone who should not have them as is ALREADY stated in the law then you will go to jail.</p>
<p>therefore it makes no sense to make more laws concerning gun control for laws allready in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapps47</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapps47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>UPDATE on HR-45. this is from the newpaper.

&quot;there are no co-sponsors of this bill, which effectively renders the bill dead.&quot;

However we still should be careful because this maybe an attempt by supporters to make us think its over and sneek it past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE on HR-45. this is from the newpaper.</p>
<p>&#8220;there are no co-sponsors of this bill, which effectively renders the bill dead.&#8221;</p>
<p>However we still should be careful because this maybe an attempt by supporters to make us think its over and sneek it past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapps47</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-1689</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapps47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/#comment-1689</guid>
		<description>true, but we dont want to lose out right in the process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>true, but we dont want to lose out right in the process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jfizz313</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-1690</link>
		<dc:creator>jfizz313</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/#comment-1690</guid>
		<description>lmao so i should be able to seell my carru guns to drug dealers if i feel i want to?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lmao so i should be able to seell my carru guns to drug dealers if i feel i want to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapps47</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-1691</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapps47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/#comment-1691</guid>
		<description>However, as i recall, you would have to have an address in the USA. I think you would need to be a resident would be the only other requirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, as i recall, you would have to have an address in the USA. I think you would need to be a resident would be the only other requirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapps47</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-1692</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapps47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/#comment-1692</guid>
		<description>Yes, non-citizens can buy guns in the USA in most states. I know of two people who did this before they became citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, non-citizens can buy guns in the USA in most states. I know of two people who did this before they became citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheHiddenPart</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-1693</link>
		<dc:creator>TheHiddenPart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/#comment-1693</guid>
		<description>Hold on, my friend: are you saying that if came to the US with a tourist Visa, i could go and buy a firearm legally?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on, my friend: are you saying that if came to the US with a tourist Visa, i could go and buy a firearm legally?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tapps47</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>Tapps47</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/2009/11/27/hr-45-debunked/#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>sadly, if you replace the word &quot;firearm&quot; with the word &quot;dog,cat or pets&quot; you get the same kind of animal nutter bill that they are tring to get passed all over the country to make everyone get ther animals licensed to have them.
It makes me wonder who is behind the bills? Groups like PETA maybe? food for thought!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sadly, if you replace the word &#8220;firearm&#8221; with the word &#8220;dog,cat or pets&#8221; you get the same kind of animal nutter bill that they are tring to get passed all over the country to make everyone get ther animals licensed to have them.<br />
It makes me wonder who is behind the bills? Groups like PETA maybe? food for thought!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

