Are YOU concerned? HR45 Blair Holt Firearms Act of 2009, the Fairness doctrine, don’t you see what’s going on?
just me asked:
Big Brother is real…but I guess many of you know that…you WANT Big Bro to redistribute wealth, take over banks and healthcare and take care of you. Well…my daddy taought me to take care of myself…shame on you who won’t!
BTW…did you hear? It’s NOT a tax break…it’s a tax cerdit..and you’ll be taxed on it next year…but then again…you like listening to the “spin”…not the truth
Related posts:
- Democrates Push Blair Holt’s HR 45 Bill to Confiscate Firearms – Gun Confiscation Visit: www The Blair Holt’s Bill, also known as...
- Democrates Push Blair Holt’s HR 45 Bill to Confiscate Firearms – Gun Confiscation Visit: www The Blair Holt’s Bill, also known as...
- Gun Control Nazi Style, H.R. 45, Blair Holt status, Ammunition scarcity The Stench of Truth 119 Gun control Nazi style....
No, I’m not concerned. Do some research – you will find those bills have very little support in congress have no real likelihood of being passed.
Where you been? This is what we’ve been squawking about for months.
The gun safe is full artillery, the floor safe is full of cash and we’re moving it all to a cabin in the woods.
We’ll be fine in four.
Yep:
Cons hare going to have to accept some responsibility for their guns.
And they won’t be able to censor people who disagree with them on the public airwaves.
And they are going to have to start paying their fair share of taxes.
Oh yeah–and the poor cons wont be able to use taxpayer’s money to fly their private jets (which don’t belong to them, anyway–they belong to the stockholders). And they won’t be able to keep issuing fradulent mortgages.. Or pay for sending American jobs overseas with taxpayer finned subsidies.
The cons aren’t going to be able to keep torturing helples prisoners, denying them a trial, hiding them in secret prisons (like the COMMUNISTS do). Obama has lifted the Bush cennsorship of military families and allowed them to decide ifthe media can cover the return of soldiers.
95% of Americans are getting a tax break so they can decide what to do with their own money.
It all ounds pretty good to me.
It’s amazing how right-wing trolls and their hosts love to pontificate, isn’t it? Unfortunately for them, they only prove my points. One of them offers: “…MSNBC, CNN are losing their audience in greater numbers, while Fox, Hannity or Rush Limbaugh numbers are increasing. …” Unfortunately, the argument is not only lacking in facts, but illustrates why the Fairness Doctrine is important. For instance, Fox “News” ranted on, as did Rush and Ken doll Sean, about WMDs in Iraq, as well as every other lie put forth by the Bush administration, reaching millions of listeners and viewers, while also slandering the U.N. weapons inspectors, who just happened to be right. If you add political Christian broadcasting to this toxic mix, you get a monopoly that is dangerous. Progressives didn’t get on Armed Forces radio until late in 2005, but even then Ed Schultz was threatened with cancellation before he even debuted, because he criticized someone in the Bush administration. This isn’t championing free speech. It is patently unfair practice. It also illustrates the tilted news our military is getting. That, too, is dangerous.
Right-wing radio offers propaganda, not facts, with the intent to play on the listeners emotions, without offering content that is based in reality. The ratings prove that FNC, Fox “News” channel is losing out in the ratings. In addition, the ignorance of conservatives about media and radio is further shown when they say the Fairness Doctrine is about “…demanding that the government implement further control or regulation over an entire industry, it might be simpler to look in the mirror, at the rating points & ad revenues & realize that the market for the “progressive” or liberal slant isn’t as popular or pervasive as you assume it to be. … Again, they miss the point. Ed Schultz and Stephanie Miller, as well as the leader in progressive talk, Randi Rhodes, are making it in the commercial market. They are not only popular, but growing. The issue is to allow more progressive hosts on local am/fm radio to see if we can also make it. Unless you’ve been in the battle for radio you don’t know what it’s like, with conservative corporations not even giving progressives a chance to get on air, or cancelling good hosts before they have the time to prove themselves. You have to give progressive hosts a chance to build an audience, which takes time. But conservatives do not want fairness, which can be seen through their trade policy, as well as their anti-union rhetoric, which has decimated the middle class, by selling out workers for outsourcing all in the name of profit. They want a one-way talking machine on radio, paid by and benefiting only their political partners in business, as well.
Right-wing is on the air and getting advertisers because they’re the only game in town, except for a few progressive hosts like Schultz, Miller and Rhodes. The Fairness Doctrine will not keep a bad show on, but it will allow entry to good hosts who are now being shut out by conservative conglomerates
The short version of the Fairness Doctrine is that in 1987 Reagan had it scuttled. Shortly after that Rush Limbaugh began his journey and right-wing radio was created and gradually took over the airwaves, with the help of their corporate friends. The Fairness Doctrine could really make a difference. Why do you think conservatives are screaming like crazy?