<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blair Holt&#8217;s Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act of 2009 (H.R. 45)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hr45.com/2009/02/06/blair-holts-firearm-licensing-and-record-of-sale-act-of-2009-hr-45/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hr45.com/2009/02/06/blair-holts-firearm-licensing-and-record-of-sale-act-of-2009-hr-45/</link>
	<description>Discuss HR 45 Blair Holt Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 04:46:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Arnold</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/02/06/blair-holts-firearm-licensing-and-record-of-sale-act-of-2009-hr-45/comment-page-1/#comment-831</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 15:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/?p=36#comment-831</guid>
		<description>As of today I cannot own a firearm because of a law passed to forbid persons convicted of domestic violence to possess one. Is it unfair? Is tracking firearms like this unfair? Lets see...good luck with it all I say. Just more laws, and complicating life more. I still have a baseball bat, plenty of knives, probably can purchase a tazer, and all sorts of potentally harmful stuff. I don&#039;t need a gun. Wouldn&#039;t mind owning one, but there is no urgency for one. Buy the way, my conviction was in 1995, my wife then &amp; I were married 1yr. We are happily married today &amp; get along great. Going to court would have ruined our marriage &amp; cost a lot of money for an attorney so I took a plea. She since has been diagnosed Schizo-effective Disorder and is properly medicated w/ Abilify &amp; other stuff. Would a gun in my home made a difference before or after our incident? I say no, but every case is different. I wasn&#039;t the psycho back then but we were both wrong and 2 wrongs don&#039;t make a right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of today I cannot own a firearm because of a law passed to forbid persons convicted of domestic violence to possess one. Is it unfair? Is tracking firearms like this unfair? Lets see&#8230;good luck with it all I say. Just more laws, and complicating life more. I still have a baseball bat, plenty of knives, probably can purchase a tazer, and all sorts of potentally harmful stuff. I don&#8217;t need a gun. Wouldn&#8217;t mind owning one, but there is no urgency for one. Buy the way, my conviction was in 1995, my wife then &amp; I were married 1yr. We are happily married today &amp; get along great. Going to court would have ruined our marriage &amp; cost a lot of money for an attorney so I took a plea. She since has been diagnosed Schizo-effective Disorder and is properly medicated w/ Abilify &amp; other stuff. Would a gun in my home made a difference before or after our incident? I say no, but every case is different. I wasn&#8217;t the psycho back then but we were both wrong and 2 wrongs don&#8217;t make a right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beverly Jamison</title>
		<link>http://hr45.com/2009/02/06/blair-holts-firearm-licensing-and-record-of-sale-act-of-2009-hr-45/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Beverly Jamison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 22:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hr45.com/?p=36#comment-2</guid>
		<description>H.R. 45 will only regulate the weapons on the honest citizens in this country, not those weapons used to commit crimes.  As an 17 years former law enforcement and corrections officer, I know without a doubt only law abiding citizens will meet the requirements of H.R. 45, not the persons who commit  the  violent crimes in this country, who use illegally obtain weapons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>H.R. 45 will only regulate the weapons on the honest citizens in this country, not those weapons used to commit crimes.  As an 17 years former law enforcement and corrections officer, I know without a doubt only law abiding citizens will meet the requirements of H.R. 45, not the persons who commit  the  violent crimes in this country, who use illegally obtain weapons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
